{-# OPTIONS --cubical-compatible #-}
module Padova2025.ComputationalContent.DoubleNegation (⊥ : Set) where
Sarcastic interpretation of classical logic#
Explain.
open import Padova2025.ProvingBasics.Connectives.Disjunction
open import Padova2025.ProvingBasics.Connectives.More
open import Padova2025.ProgrammingBasics.Lists
infix 3 ¬_
¬_ : Set → Set -- enter `¬` as `\neg`
¬ P = (P → ⊥)
returnreturn : {A : Set} → A → ¬ ¬ A
return = {!!}
⊥-elim⊥-elim : {A : Set} → ⊥ → ¬ ¬ A
⊥-elim = {!!}
escapeescape : ¬ ¬ ⊥ → ⊥
escape = {!!}
oracleoracle : {A : Set} → ¬ ¬ (A ⊎ ¬ A)
oracle = {!!}
infixl 1 _>>=_ _⟫=_
_>>=__>>=_ : {A B : Set} → ¬ ¬ A → (A → ¬ ¬ B) → ¬ ¬ B
_>>=_ = {!!}
_⟫=_ : {A B : Set} → ¬ ¬ A → (A → ¬ ¬ B) → ¬ ¬ B
_⟫=_ = _>>=_
liftA2liftA2 : {A B C : Set} → (A → B → C) → ¬ ¬ A → ¬ ¬ B → ¬ ¬ C
liftA2 = {!!}
sequencesequence : {X : Set} {P : X → Set} {xs : List X} → All (λ x → ¬ ¬ P x) xs → ¬ ¬ All P xs
sequence = {!!}
The infinitary analogue of the sequence function is known as double-negation
shift. It is not generally available in constructive mathematics. Already the
countable version fails in general, that is, in Agda we cannot write down a
value of type DNS:
open import Padova2025.ProgrammingBasics.Naturals.Base
DNS : Set₁
DNS = {P : ℕ → Set} → ((n : ℕ) → ¬ ¬ P n) → ¬ ¬ ((n : ℕ) → P n)
The assumption (n : ℕ) → ¬ ¬ P n expresses that, for each number n,
somewhere in the platonic heaven there is a witness of P n, without
disclosing or giving any way to find it. The conclusion ¬ ¬ ((n : ℕ) → P n)
expresses that, somewhere in the platonic heaven, there is a function
mapping natural numbers n to witnesses of P n. The double-negation shift
principle expresses the conviction that it is possible to collect all these
anonymous witnesses into a function. This fails, for instance, in the effective
topos and in most sheaf toposes.